Rentvesting: Rent Where You Love, Invest Where You Profit

Complete guide to the rentvesting strategy, how renting in your preferred location while owning investment property elsewhere can accelerate wealth building.

What is Rentvesting?

Rentvesting is when you rent in the area where you want to live, while owning an investment property in a different location chosen for growth returns. It separates lifestyle choices from investment decisions, allowing tax deductions, better market access, and flexibility without being locked into an expensive mortgage in an area that may not perform as an investment.
Last reviewed: February 2026 by Rasti Vaibhav, CFA | Founder, Get RARE Properties
"First Home or Investment Property? Why Aussies Invest First": Rasti Vaibhav explains the complete rentvesting framework using real numbers from his personal 18+ property portfolio.

Rentvesting in Four Points

  1. You rent where you want to live; you invest where the numbers work
  2. Investment property offers tax deductions that owner-occupied homes don't
  3. A rentvesting investor can save up to 140% more annually on the same income
  4. It suits wealth-builders comfortable being renters, not ideal for those prioritising stability or personalisation
Illustration explaining the rentvesting strategy: a person stands between two homes. On the left, a home with a ‘Rent’ sign shows that you can rent a property near work or family; on the right, a home labeled ‘Buy’ shows owning an investment property in a high‑growth suburb. The image shows that rentvesting gives you the flexibility to live where you want while investing elsewhere. It notes that rentvesting allows you to join property investors without sacrificing lifestyle. It also highlights that rentvesting requires careful planning and invites viewers to decide if rentvesting is right for them. Illustration explaining the rentvesting strategy: a person stands between two homes. On the left, a home with a ‘Rent’ sign shows that you can rent a property near work or family; on the right, a home labeled ‘Buy’ shows owning an investment property in a high‑growth suburb. The image shows that rentvesting gives you the flexibility to live where you want while investing elsewhere. It notes that rentvesting allows you to join property investors without sacrificing lifestyle. It also highlights that rentvesting requires careful planning and invites viewers to decide if rentvesting is right for them.

Written by Rasti Vaibhav

​​​​​​​CFA Charterholder  |  Founder, Get RARE Properties

Rasti has built an 18+ property portfolio using the rentvesting strategy described in this guide. He has guided clients through $250M+ in property acquisitions across Australia. This guide reflects his lived experience, not just theory.

Named: Australia's Top 50 Small Business Leaders 2025

Key Takeaways

  • Rentvesting separates where you live from where you invest
  • Investment properties offer tax deductions unavailable to owner-occupiers
  • The strategy suits income-stable professionals willing to rent long-term
  • The main trade-off is CGT on sale, often offset by cumulative annual tax savings
  • Entry is possible with a 10% deposit + LMI; ideal starting point is 20%

1. What is Rentvesting?

Rentvesting is a property investment strategy where you:

. RENT In the area where
you want to live: lifestyle, work, family
.and
. INVEST In property in a different location: chosen for growth and returns

Factor Owner-Occupied Home Rentvesting
Tax Deductions None Mortgage interest, depreciation, all expenses
CGT on Sale Exempt (main residence) Payable: 50% discount after 12 months
Lifestyle Choice Fixed to purchase area Free to live anywhere
Investment Selection Limited by lifestyle Pure fundamentals
Entry Cost Higher (premium suburb) Lower (growth area)
Dual Commitments One payment Rent + mortgage
Renovation Rights Full control Not permitted as tenant
Career Flexibility Anchored Mobile

Why Rentvesting Emerged

Rentvesting became popular as Australian property prices in desirable locations outpaced income growth.
​​​​​​​
According to CoreLogic data, Australian dwelling values grew an average of 6.8% annually over the decade to 2024. In Sydney and Melbourne, median prices exceeded $1M, effectively pricing out buyers on household incomes below $200K.

The maths stopped working for those who wanted to live where they wanted and own the property they lived in.

"Rentvesting separates where you live from where you invest. Most Australians are taught to treat these as the same decision. The evidence suggests separating them is often the more financially rational choice."
- Rasti Vaibhav

2. Why "Dream Home First" Fails Investors

 Owning your own home feels like the Australian dream. But the numbers tell a different story for wealth builders. There are three silent wealth drains most advisors don't discuss openly.
Infographic titled ‘What Buying a First Home Really Costs’ showing holding costs (interest, maintenance, rates and insurance), transaction friction (stamp duty, agent fees, moving costs), opportunity cost (a $100 k deposit locked in lifestyle) and upsides (stability, CGT‑free growth, grants and equity). This graphic explains the true cost of putting your foot on the property ladder, the friction when you sell the property and how property management fees and other expenses can make it harder to get onto the property. It contrasts securing a property to live in with using property as a way to enter the market, emphasising that property means more than just a place to live. Infographic titled ‘What Buying a First Home Really Costs’ showing holding costs (interest, maintenance, rates and insurance), transaction friction (stamp duty, agent fees, moving costs), opportunity cost (a $100 k deposit locked in lifestyle) and upsides (stability, CGT‑free growth, grants and equity). This graphic explains the true cost of putting your foot on the property ladder, the friction when you sell the property and how property management fees and other expenses can make it harder to get onto the property. It contrasts securing a property to live in with using property as a way to enter the market, emphasising that property means more than just a place to live.

 Drain #1: Holding Costs

Your home costs money every month, none of it tax deductible:
  • Mortgage interest: largest cost, fully non-deductible
  • Council rates: $2,000–$4,000/year 
  • Insurance: $1,500–$2,500/year
  • Maintenance: 1–2% of property value annually

On an $800K home: $50,000–$70,000 annually in total holding costs. Not one dollar of this is tax deductible

 Drain #2: Transaction Friction

Round-trip buying and selling costs:
  • Stamp duty: $40,000 on $800K in VIC
  • Legal fees: $2,000–$3,000
  • Building and pest: $800
  • Moving costs: $2,000–$5,000
  • Agent fees on sale: $15,000–$20,000

Total: $60,000–$70,000 in dead money, you never see it again

 Darin #3: Opportunity Cost

Your $160K deposit on an $800K property is locked in bricks earning nothing. That same capital in an investment property earns rental income, generates tax deductions, and compounds via capital growth. In your owner-occupied home: zero income from that capital

The Honest Trade-Off: What You Do Get

Owner-occupied home benefits:
  • Stability and control: your space, your rules, no landlord
  • CGT exemption on sale if main residence criteria are met
  • Emotional security: pride of ownership, family stability
  • Forced savings: every repayment builds equity

​​​​​​​These are real and legitimate. The question is whether they are worth forgoing investment growth, tax deductions, and flexibility.

The Wealth Test

 Your Home Bills You

  • No rental income
  • No tax deductions
  • Ongoing costs every year
  • Concentrated risk in one location

An Investment Property Pays You

  • Rental income
  • Tax deductions (interest, depreciation, expenses)
  • Chosen for growth fundamentals
  • Geographic diversification possible

 3.  How Rentvesting Works

RENTVESTING = RENT (Lifestyle) + INVEST (Wealth)
location_on
Step 1: Choose where you want to LIVE
→  Consider: Work, family, lifestyle, schools
→  Rent in this location ($400–$800/week typical)
→  Flexibility: Can move for career changes without selling
trending_up
Step 2: Choose where you want to INVEST
→  Consider: Capital growth fundamentals, rental yield, infrastructure
→  Buy here: $500K–$1M depending on budget and market
→  Focus: Investment-grade property (top 10%), not emotional purchase
attach_money
Step 3: Finance investment property efficiently
→  Interest-only loan (maximise deductions in early years)
→  Deposit: 10–20% (LMI available if needed to start sooner)
→  Separate loan and offset account, keep investment clean
call_merge
Step 4: Manage both commitments
→  Rent: Paid from after-tax income
→  Investment: Mortgage + expenses partially offset by rent + deductions
→  Net cost: Often lower than buying expensive home in preferred location

 Melbourne Example

Situation: Professional couple, combined income $180K, want to live in inner Melbourne.
OPTION A: BUY IN INNER MELBOURNE
Purchase: $1,100,000
Deposit (20%): $220,000
Loan: $880,000
Repayments: $66,000/yr
Holding costs: $12,000/yr

TOTAL: $78,000/yr
Tax deductions: $0
OPTION B: RENTVESTING
Rent in Melbourne: $35,000/yr
Investment (Cranbourne): $700K
Deposit (20%): $140,000
Repayments: $42,000/yr
Holding costs: $10,000/yr
Less rental income: −$23,400
Less tax deductions: −$15,000

NET COST: $48,600/yr
SAVING: $29,400/yr

4. Benefits of Rentvesting

 BENEFIT 1: TAX ADVANTAGES

What you can claim on an investment property (zero of these are available on an owner-occupied home):
  • Mortgage interest, typically the largest single deduction
  • Property management fees (6–8% of rent)
  • Council rates and water charges
  • Building insurance and landlord insurance
  • Maintenance and repairs
  • Depreciation (building + fixtures)
  • Loan establishment fees and accountant fee

Income: $120,000
Deductions: $25,000
Tax saved: ~$9,000/yr

settings
FACT
A rentvesting investor on $120K income can reduce their taxable income by up to $58,000 annually through mortgage interest deductions, depreciation, and property expenses, compared to zero deductions for an owner-occupier.

 BENEFIT 2: LIFESTYLE FLEXIBILITY

Rentvesting lets you live where your life is, close to work, near family, in areas you actually enjoy, without needing to buy there. ABS data shows Australian renters now account for 32% of households, up from 26% in 2006. The stigma of renting is shifting

 BENEFIT 3: BETTER INVESTMENT CHOICES

When you rent your home, you invest purely on fundamentals: growth history, infrastructure, rental demand. There's no emotional attachment, no compromise. This typically produces better returns over 10+ years than buying a home in a suburb chosen for lifestyle.

 BENEFIT 4: LOWER ENTRY COST

A dream home in Sydney requires a $280K deposit. An investment property in a growth area might need $130K. That $150K difference means entering the market 2–3 years sooner, and time in market compounds.

 BENEFIT 5: DIVERSIFICATION

One expensive home concentrates all your capital in one location, one property, one market. Rentvesting allows you to build a portfolio of 2–3 properties over time with geographic diversification.

 BENEFIT 6: CAREER FLEXIBILITY

Owning a home anchors you and imposes $40K–$60K in round-trip transaction costs when you move. Rentvesting: end the lease, relocate, keep the investment property professionally managed. No disruption to your investment strategy.

5.  Risks and Trade-Offs

Rentvesting isn't perfect. Here are the honest trade-offs.

 TRADE-OFF 1: NO CGT EXEMPTION

Owner-Occupied
Buy $800K → sell $1.2M = $400K gain = $0 tax
​​​​​​​
Investment Property
Buy $700K → sell $1.1M = $200K taxable (after 50% discount) = ~$74K tax
settings
FACT
The 50% CGT discount applies to investment properties held more than 12 months. On a $400K capital gain, this reduces the taxable amount to $200K, potentially $74K in tax at the 37% marginal rate. Annual tax savings across 10 years often exceed this CGT liability.

 TRADE-OFF 2: DUAL FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS

Rent ($2,600/month) plus investment mortgage ($3,500/month) = $6,100/month total. This requires careful cashflow management and a meaningful buffer.
Mitigation: 6–12 month cash buffer, conservative borrowing, high-demand investment area (low vacancy risk).

 TRADE-OFF 3: RENTER UNCERTAINTY

Landlords can increase rent or sell, requiring you to move. Lease renewals create periodic uncertainty. You cannot renovate or personalise your home.
Not right for those who need complete residential stability, have school-aged children, or want to renovate extensively.

 TRADE-OFF 4: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT REQUIRED

You are the landlord: tenant management, maintenance, compliance, rent collection. Most investors use a professional property manager at 6–8% of rent ($1,800–$2,400/year on $30K rent).

 TRADE-OFF 5: VACANCY RISK

Investment property can sit vacant between tenants (typically 2–4 weeks). You still pay mortgage and holding costs. Mitigation: buy in low-vacancy areas (below 2%), price competitively, maintain the property well, hold a 6–12 month cash buffer.

6.  Real Case Study: The 140% Difference

Same income. Same age. Same savings. Different strategy. One year on, $13,230 apart.

 AMAR'S APPROACH: BUY OWN HOME

COSTS
Purchase: $750,000
Deposit (20%): $150,000
Loan (P&I, 7.5%): $600,000
Repayments: $53,400/yr
Rates + insurance + maintenance: $11,500/yr

Total property cost: $64,900/yr
Tax deductions: $0
INCOME & SAVINGS
Gross income: $120,000
Tax paid: $29,097
Net income: $90,903
After property costs: $26,003
Less living expenses (~$60K): deficit

​​​​​​​Annual savings capacity: $9,462

 TANIA'S APPROACH: RENTVESTING

COSTS
Investment: $640,000
Deposit (20%): $128,000
Loan (IO, 7.5%): $512,000
Investment costs: $46,220/yr
Less rental income: −$26,000/yr
Net investment cost: $20,220/yr
Rent paid (living): $28,600/yr

​​​​​​​Total property costs: $48,820/yr
TAX ADVANTAGE
Gross income: $120,000
Tax deductions: $58,020
Taxable income: $61,980
Tax paid: $10,619
Net income: $109,381

​​​​​​​Effective annual savings: $22,692
Category Amar — Own Home Tania — Rentvesting Difference
Income $120,000 $120,000
Tax Paid $29,097 $10,619 Tania saves $18,478
Annual Property Cost $64,900 $48,820 Tania saves $16,080
Annual Savings $9,462 $22,692 +$13,230
Savings Rate Baseline 240% +140% higher
DISCLAIMER: These figures are illustrative only and do not constitute financial advice. Assumptions: $120K income, 2025–26 tax rates, 7.5% interest rate, standard depreciation schedule, ~4% rental yield. Your actual figures will vary. Consult your accountant.
settings
FACT
On the same $120,000 income, a rentvesting investor can save $13,230 more per year than a homeowner. Over a decade, that is $132,300 additional wealth, enough for the deposit on a second investment property.

DOWNLOAD: Amar Vs Tania: Complete Financial Comparison

Get the full case study with:
  • Year-by-year cash flow comparison (5 years)
  • Complete tax calculation breakdown
  • Equity building comparison
  • Customisable spreadsheet templat

Get Access to the Case Study for PPOR vs IP comparison!

mail
mail
mail
mail
settings
Access the Case Study Here!

7.  Tax Comparison

Expense Investment Property Owner-Occupied
Mortgage Interest ✓ Fully deductible ✗ Not deductible
Property Management ✓ Deductible — N/A
Council Rates ✓ Deductible ✗ Not deductible
Building Insurance ✓ Deductible ✗ Not deductible
Landlord Insurance ✓ Deductible — N/A
Maintenance & Repairs ✓ Deductible ✗ Not deductible
Depreciation ✓ Deductible ✗ Not deductible
Loan Establishment Fees ✓ Deductible (5 yrs) ✗ Not deductible
Accountant Fees ✓ Deductible ✗ Not deductible

 TAX BENEFIT EXAMPLE

Investment property: $700K | Loan: $560K @ 7.5%
ANNUAL DEDUCTIONS
Interest: $42,000
Depreciation: $14,000
Mgmt fees: $2,080
Council rates: $2,000
Insurance: $1,500
Maintenance: $2,500
Other: $920

​​​​​​​Total: $65,000
RESULT
Without deductions: $29,097 tax
With deductions: $8,797 tax

​​​​​​​Tax saved: $20,300/yr

Net rent cost after tax savings:
$28,600 − $20,300 = $8,300/yr

Building equity while spending
just $8,300 on housing per year

8.  LMI Strategy: Speed vs Waiting

Many buyers wait for a 20% deposit to avoid LMI. The maths on waiting often doesn't support this approach.
WAIT FOR 20%
Currently have: $80,000
Need to save: $50,000 more
Time to save: 25 months

Property appreciates 6%:
New price: $731,250
New 20% needed: $146,250

You are $16,250 FURTHER BEHIND
USE LMI NOW (10%)
Deposit: $65,000
LMI cost: ~$13,000
Enter at: $650,000

Growth over 25 months: +$81,000
Less LMI cost: −$13,000

NET BENEFIT: +$68,000 vs waiting

LMI is tax deductible
settings
FACT
Using LMI to enter the market 25 months sooner at a 10% deposit can preserve $68K in relative wealth compared to waiting to save a full 20% deposit, even after accounting for the ~$13K LMI premium.
Illustration of two diverging roads representing the LMI toll road to faster growth, with one lane labelled ‘Slow Down: Waiting for 20% deposit’ and another lane leading to ‘Go: Faster Growth’ through a toll booth marked ‘LMI at 2 %’. The graphic shows how paying LMI helps buyers get onto the property ladder sooner, even if an investment property may be involved. It explains that saving a large deposit while property increases in value within an area can cost buyers more. It emphasises that the property type does not matter and that taking the fast lane can help buyers enter the market in a desired area more quickly, highlighting how property may appreciate while you wait. Illustration of two diverging roads representing the LMI toll road to faster growth, with one lane labelled ‘Slow Down: Waiting for 20% deposit’ and another lane leading to ‘Go: Faster Growth’ through a toll booth marked ‘LMI at 2 %’. The graphic shows how paying LMI helps buyers get onto the property ladder sooner, even if an investment property may be involved. It explains that saving a large deposit while property increases in value within an area can cost buyers more. It emphasises that the property type does not matter and that taking the fast lane can help buyers enter the market in a desired area more quickly, highlighting how property may appreciate while you wait.
Deposit % Deposit Amount LVR LMI Cost (Approx) Note
20% $130,000 80% $0 Ideal — no LMI
15% $97,500 85% ~$8,500 Sweet spot
10% $65,000 90% ~$13,000 Most common entry
5% $32,500 95% ~$22,000 Approach cautiously

9.  Is Rentvesting Right for You?

Rentvesting makes sense if these apply:
☐  Stable income: $80K+ single, or $140K+ household
☐  Job security is strong
☐  Emergency fund: 6–12 months expenses (separate from deposit)
☐  You value living in a specific expensive area
☐  Career or family requires a specific location
☐  Priority is wealth building, not homeownership
☐  You want the tax advantages of investment property
☐  Comfortable being a renter long-term
☐  Can separate emotion from investment decisions
☐  Accept CGT liability on investment property
Rentvesting probably NOT right if:
☐  Home ownership is an emotional priority: you need to 'own'
☐  Income is unstable or job security is uncertain
☐  Cannot maintain a 6+ month cash buffer
☐  Planning to start a family soon and need school stability
☐  Unwilling to be a renter long-term
☐  Want to renovate and personalise your living space
☐  Short timeline: buying own home within 2–3 years
DECISION TRIGGER
If you need to spend more than 40% of gross household income to buy in your preferred location, rentvesting is worth serious analysis.

ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS
  1. Scenario 1 - Buy Affordable Home:  Best if you can afford a home in an acceptable location, prefer stability, and plan to stay 10+ years. Buy, build equity, invest later.
  2. Scenario 2 - Hybrid Sequential:  Best if currently a couple, may start a family in 5+ years. Rentvest for 5–7 years, accumulate deposits, buy own home when family stage begins.
  3. Scenario 3 - Regional Relocation:  Best if remote-capable and willing to move to an affordable area. Buy a home there, save separately for investments.

 10.  Implementation Blueprint

Step 1: Assess Your Financial Position
→  Calculate income stability, savings, existing debts, emergency buffer
→  Get borrowing capacity from a mortgage broker
→  Can you service dual commitments? If yes → Step 2
playlist_add_check
Step 2: Define Your Criteria
→  Lifestyle location: Work, family, lifestyle, school zones, rent budget ($400–$800/week)
→  Investment location: Budget ($500K–$1M), growth vs yield, metro vs regional
location_on
Step 3: Research Investment Locations
→  Infrastructure pipeline, diverse employment, population growth
→  Vacancy below 2%, 7–10 year growth trend, income-to-price ratio
→  Shortlist 3–5 suburbs meeting all criteria
attach_money
Step 4: Structure Finance
→  Engage a mortgage broker experienced in investment lending
→  Interest-only loan + offset account + pre-approval
→  Stress test at +2% interest rate increase
shopping_cart
Step 5: Purchase Investment Property
→  Due diligence: building & pest, contract review, rental appraisal
→  Negotiate or engage a buyer's agent for access and advocacy
→  Exchange contracts and settle (4–6 weeks typical)
Step 6: Set Up for Rental
→  Engage property manager before settlement
→  Arrange landlord insurance, order depreciation schedule
→  Notify accountant for tax planning from day one
Step 7: Secure Your Rental
→  Start search 4–6 weeks out, negotiate 12–24 month lease
→  Build strong tenant relationship for long-term stability
→  Annual review: tax return, refinance check, next acquisition timing

11.  Common Objections Answered

"I'm throwing away rent money"
Rent is not throwing money away, it's the cost of housing. Mortgage interest is also a cost of housing. On an $800K home: $60K interest + $12K in rates and maintenance = $72K/year in housing costs, none tax-deductible. Rent on a comparable property: $30K–$35K/year. You pay less for housing by renting. The difference can be invested.

"Rentvesting hurts my borrowing power"
Investment property can actually improve borrowing capacity over time. Lenders count ~75% of rental income after 12 months of tax returns. After 3–5 years you have equity, proven income, and a stronger financial position. Many Get RARE clients buy their own home after 5–7 years using investment equity as part of the deposit. Rentvesting delays ownership; it does not prevent it.

"What if property prices fall?"
Property price risk exists whether rentvesting or owner-occupying. Rentvesting mitigations: buy investment-grade assets, hold long-term (7–10+ years), build a portfolio for diversification, rental income continues during downturns. Owner-occupied homes have all capital in one location with no rental income to offset costs. Both carry risk. Rentvesting provides more structural ways to manage it.

"I want stability for my kids"
Valid concern. Options: rentvest before children and buy own home when family begins; negotiate 2–3 year leases for stability; choose areas with multiple school options. If family stability is non-negotiable at this life stage, the hybrid sequential approach may suit better.

"I want to renovate my home"
If renovation is important, rentvesting has real limitations; you cannot renovate a property you rent. Alternatives: rent a modern property (someone else bore the cost). If renovation is a genuine priority, traditional ownership is likely the better fit.

12.  Frequently Asked Questions

Rentvesting is when you rent in the suburb where you want to live while owning investment property in a different location chosen for growth and returns. It separates your lifestyle location from your investment location, allowing tax deductions, market flexibility, and lifestyle freedom.

It depends on whether your priority is wealth building or ownership and stability. On the same income, rentvesting can generate 140% higher annual savings, but it involves CGT on sale and dual financial commitments. Neither is universally better. It depends on your goals, timeline, and risk tolerance.

You rent where you want to live, while owning investment property in a location chosen for capital growth. Tax deductions on the investment property reduce taxable income and help offset rent costs. The property is professionally managed, generating rental income and building equity.

No, if structured correctly. After 3–5 years you have equity, proven rental income, and often a stronger position than if you had spent those years saving a larger deposit. Many investors purchase their own home after 5–7 years using investment equity as part of the deposit.

Minimum 10% with LMI, or 20% to avoid LMI. On a $600K property: $60K minimum (plus approximately $13K LMI) or $120K at 20%. A separate 6–12 month cash buffer is also required; do not use this from your deposit funds.

Investment properties offer deductions unavailable to owner-occupiers: mortgage interest, management fees, council rates, insurance, maintenance, and depreciation. On a $700K property, annual deductions can reach $65,000, reducing taxable income from $120,000 to $55,000 and saving approximately $20,000 in tax. The trade-off is CGT on eventual sale.

Buy in areas with under 2% vacancy, maintain the property well, price rent competitively, and use a quality property manager. Budget for 2–4 weeks vacancy annually. A 6–12 month cash buffer before starting protects you during vacancy periods.

The effective minimum is 5–7 years, enough to build meaningful equity and let tax advantages compound. Many investors continue for 10–15 years, building a 2–3 property portfolio before purchasing their own home.

Yes. Most investors find themselves in a stronger position after rentvesting. Investment equity, proven rental income, and accumulated savings often combine to provide a larger effective deposit for the owner-occupied purchase.

No. The rent you pay as a tenant is not deductible. What is deductible is the mortgage interest, management fees, depreciation, and property expenses on your investment property. Those tax savings help offset your rent costs.

13.  Next Steps

 QUICK ACTION CHECKLIST: 15 MINUTES

If rentvesting interests you, do these five things today:
☐  Calculate your borrowing capacity: use an online calculator or call a broker
☐  List 3 areas where you'd want to live (potential rental locations)
☐  List 3 areas where you'd consider investing (budget + fundamentals)
☐  Check current rents in your preferred living areas on realestate.com.au
☐  Download the case study comparison here

Not Sure If Rentvesting Suits Your Situation?

Book a complimentary 30-minute strategy session with Rasti. No obligation. No pitch. Just a direct conversation about your numbers.
settings
Book Your Strategy Session

Written by Rasti Vaibhav

CFA Charterholder  |  Founder, Get RARE Properties

Rasti has built an 18+ property portfolio using the rentvesting strategy described in this guide. He has guided clients through $250M+ in property acquisitions across Australia. This guide reflects his lived experience, not just theory.

Named: Australia's Top 50 Small Business Leaders 2025

Disclaimer

General Information Only. This guide provides general information about rentvesting strategy. It does not constitute personal financial, tax, legal, or investment advice.

Not Personal Advice. We do not know your individual circumstances, financial position, risk tolerance, or goals. This guide cannot account for your specific situation.

Professional Advice Required. Before implementing rentvesting or any investment strategy, consult a licensed financial adviser, qualified accountant, mortgage broker, and solicitor.

Case Study Limitations. The Amar vs Tania case study uses illustrative figures. Your actual numbers will vary based on property prices, location, interest rates, income, tax bracket, rental income, vacancy, and expenses.

No Guarantee of Results. Property values can fall as well as rise. Rental income is not guaranteed. Interest rates change. Tax laws change.

Tax Information. Based on 2025–26 tax laws. Always consult a qualified accountant for advice specific to your circumstances.

Regulatory. Get RARE Properties is not licensed to provide personal financial advice. This content is educational only, published under Australian Consumer Law.
 
  © 2026 All Rights Reserved  
[bot_catcher]